How
to Irritate, Annoy or otherwise drive away decent job candidates
By an anonymous
housing professional involved in a job search
I admit
it. I am a frustrated job seeker. I am a viable candidate for positions
within residence life and other areas of student affairs except that
I suspect my underlying disappointment with the search process has bubbled
to the surface a few too many times. “Why?” you might ask.
“Why is the author discouraged by what she has seen in the past
few months?” Allow me to provide some pointers to anyone with
responsibility for coordinating a search process and to share some of
what I have experienced as a candidate:
Please
confirm that you have received my application. Send a letter,
send an e-mail, send a camel, I don’t care how, but let me know
that you have my application in hand. Yes, this is time consuming, but,
frankly, it’s the polite thing to do. Yes, I can contact you myself
but likely I am employed full time, searching for a job, and trying
to have a life while it’s part of your job to organize a selection
process. Additionally, you will build a good impression with your candidates
that you are organized and professional in this area, likely this is
the case in other areas.
If
my application is incomplete, let me know. I know what you
are thinking: if the applicant can’t submit a proper and complete
application, who wants her? Guess what? You might! You might be surprised
to learn that not all job postings are created equal. On more than one
occasion, I have found postings for the same position to include different
information. This is more likely to happen when you and Human Resources
split up where the position is posted. Ask yourself: do you want a good
pool of candidates? If so, make a bit of effort to insure you don’t
eliminate candidates for purely administrative reasons.
Provide
candidates, particularly those who interview on campus, with a job description.
I was provided with a complete position description for only two of
eight campus interviews. A great deal of information is on-line and
many position postings are quite lengthy. Unfortunately, most were not
official position descriptions, blatantly omitting key information.
In addition to helping your candidate prepare for the interview, a position
description is considered a legal contract. It is as much to the benefit
of the employer as it is to the candidate to be informed of expectations
in advance. Plus you’ll look pretty dumb if asked for a position
description and you don’t have one readily available.
Be
up-front about interview arrangements and expenses. More often
than not, I had to ask about expenses for the interviews as well as
details about who would participate in the interview. I know that funds
are tight everywhere, but to put the burden on me seemed, at times,
like a way to save money. I had to wonder if the offer to reimburse
would have been made had I not asked. To be honest, if I have to pay
for travel and housing, that may be a factor in whether I accept the
interview offer. I was also skeptical of situations where I was provided
with little information about the interview schedule. It should be easy
for me to obtain information about who I will meet, or at least the
departments/constituents to be represented.
Talk
with me about salary and related issues early on. No one wants
to waste the time for the candidate and interviewers when the remuneration
will not be acceptable. You might lose a candidate or two, but better
that you don’t waste your time.
If
your approach does not include sharing salary information before the
interview, do share it during the interview. Give the candidate
some time with Human Resources to ask questions about benefits and other
matters. It will not hurt your chances with the candidate if you provide
information. Withholding information or making the candidate do the
work by calling Human Resources has the potential to disenchant your
candidates.
Be
flexible, rather than standing on rigid structure. I was offered
a campus interview that would have involved a six-hour one-way drive
for only one hour of interview time with a search committee. I pointed
out that I would have to leave my home at 6 am because of the times
they had available for me and would not return home until 7 pm. I asked
if a telephone interview was possible and was told no. I was also informed
that no travel reimbursement or housing would be provided (this, during
the summer for a residence life position). Had I wanted to split up
my travel between two days, I would have to bear the hotel expense in
a metropolitan area. It is likely that this employer has routinely hired
local candidates and has not previously encountered the issues I presented.
However, their inflexibility painted the outlines of a picture that
I did not care for. I declined the interview and, as may be obvious,
was left with a less than positive impression of the institution.
In a similar
vein, after a very good telephone interview experience, an employer
offered me a choice of three consecutive interview dates. I described
that a previously scheduled interview and the distance between them
would make it impossible for me to interview on any of the noted dates.
I was told that these were the only dates the search committee was available
and that they would move to other candidates. I later received a letter
noting that the search was not successful and they plan to re-open in
the spring. Go figure.
If
you delegate tasks related to campus interview communication to someone
else, make sure that this person knows as much as possible about the
process. I had some unfortunate interactions with support staff
that obviously had not previously arranged interviews. Their lack of
preparation was staggering. Everything from whether housing would be
available, to the structure of the interview schedule, to whether a
parking permit would be necessary. By all means, delegate the details
to someone else, but be sure they have the necessary information.
Provide
the candidate with a printed interview schedule, including the names
and titles of everyone present. It is awkward for a candidate
to handle multiple introductions, make eye contact, shake hands and
get proper spelling, titles, and other information. Simplify this for
me, rather than presenting yet another barrier to an inviting climate.
I’m a little stressed by the interview so anything you can do
to make me feel welcome will enhance my opinion of you, other staff
and the institution.
Okay,
here’s a tough one. Let me know when you fill the position.
Sounds stupid, doesn’t it? Except that I have been “notified”
that positions have been filled simply by looking at websites. I don’t
quite understand how employers overlook this in this age of technology.
If I learn of the vacancy from your website, chances are quite good
that I will check that site periodically. While I could assume that
this means the position is filled, for some employers it means there
are interviews in progress, which, as we know, does not mean those interviews
will be successful. Send me something (maybe another camel) to let me
know that the position is no longer vacant.
A corollary
to the last comment: if I travel to your campus for an interview
(no matter how long an interview) please have the common decency to
personally notify me of the outcome. Two of seven potential
employers lacked the ability to pick up the phone and tell me that a
different candidate was selected; they sent letters. I’m a grown
up, for goodness sake! When I spoke to one Human Resources director
about this, I was told that sometimes the conversations were unpleasant
because the unsuccessful candidates became upset. Let me remind you
that this is a telephone call, not a face to face meeting where the
candidate could potentially leap over a desk. If a candidate is going
to be upset with a phone call, won’t that person be as upset (or
more) when they get a form letter? And isn’t this your job? In
fifteen years of hiring and calling unsuccessful candidates, not one
reacted negatively when I informed them we were not extending an offer.
Pick up the phone and spend ten minutes with me. I’ll respect
you as a colleague, which could lead me to speak highly of your process
to others. Which leads me to…
Provide
the unsuccessful campus interview candidate with some feedback.
The candidate spent their time in the interview and traveled to your
campus. Most likely, s/he spent quite a bit of time researching and
preparing for the interview. While you and others are investing time,
the candidate is not getting paid for this and is probably taking vacation
time to participate in the interview process. So please, when you call
me to tell me you’ve hired someone else, toss me a bone and tell
me what I did well. If you have the courage, point out where I could
have improved or where there were significant differences in philosophy.
I want to improve my chances at a job. Perhaps not with you, but you
can help me adjust what I am doing.
Now that
I’ve provided a litany of complaints and suggestions, let me tell
you that I have interacted with a number of employers this summer who
practice all of the suggested actions…and more. Most employers
are courteous and professional, and are interested in sharing information
about their organization and position. They are respectful of candidates’
time and effort, welcoming, upbeat, candid and realistic about what
they have to offer the candidate. . I met and/or spoke with countless
people who, regardless of the search outcome, treated me well and made
me feel good about their program and institution. The best search processes
are those where the employer recognizes that the hiring process is two-sided
and both want to end it on a positive note.